News Stories


Newsletter Subscribe Newsletter Home
Research

BHI Study Suggests Thin-Tube BTEs Appeal to Younger Audience

Alexandria, Va—A recent survey conducted by Sergei Kochkin, PhD, executive director of the Better Hearing Institute (BHI), looked at the reasons for purchasing “thin-tube” BTEs and sought to determine if this relatively new product class is causing more people to seek a hearing solution via hearing aids.

The study analyzed the use of “thin-tube” BTEs—including open-fit, receiver in the ear (RITE), on-the-ear (OTE), and post auricular canal (PAC) devices —in 116 dispensing offices that were members of the BHI Referral Development Network (see www.hearingreview.com/article.php?s=HR/2002/02&p=2). Each office/practice was asked questions about their last 2 customers fit with thin-tube BTEs (ie, a sample of 232 customers).

Of these 232 customers in the survey, 68% were new users, and the average age was 60 years. When compared to MarkeTrak VII data (see www.hearingreview.com/article.php?s=HR/2005/07&p=1), this represents a 29% increase in new users and a more youthful customer base (by an average of 9 years).
Patient involvement in the decision to purchase a thin-tube device was deemed as “major” in 16% of the fittings, “minor” in 66% of the fittings, and “none” in 17% of the fittings, suggesting that the dispensing professional’s recommendation was the key factor in the purchase. The top-five reasons for choosing the aids were less occlusion, fit and comfort issues, better sound quality, greater patient benefit, and cosmetics.

A total of 1-in-5 (22%) consumers would have otherwise rejected all other hearing aid technology in the absense of the thin-tube device, according to the dispensing professionals surveyed. Compared to traditional products, the hearing care professionals reported that 55% of their patients were “significantly more satisfied” with the thin-tube devices, while 36% were “more satisfied,” 8% experienced “equal” satisfaction, and 1% were “less satisfied.” 

Results from the survey suggest that the appeal of thin-tube BTEs are due to (in order of definite benefit):

  1. Less occlusion;
  2. Fit and comfort;
  3. Better sound quality;
  4. Better benefit;
  5. Visibility
  6. Directional mics;
  7. Hearing healthcare provider recommendation;
  8. Looks less like a hearing aid;
  9. Instant fit;
  10. Less returns;
  11. Responded to ads;
  12. No ear impression
  13. Customer recommendation;
  14. More power;
  15. Colors;
  16. More controls.

Cosmetics obviously play a large role in the appeal of the devices. If the patients who had not opted for thin-tube devices, the dispensing professionals said they would otherwise have chosen an ITC or CIC in 46% of cases, followed by mini-BTE (14%), BTE (12%), or ITE (7%) devices. New users were more likely to be motivated to choose the device based on visibility/cosmetics (45% cited this as a definite purchase reason vs 25% for experienced users), and 32% of new users (versus 17% for experienced users) were definitely motivated to choose the thin-tube device because it looks “less like a hearing aid.” When considering the new users, survey respondents said that 24% would have rejected a traditional hearing aid (versus 17% for experienced users).
 
A more in-depth look at the survey results will be offered by Kochkin in a future publication. For more information on BHI, visit www.betterhearing.org.

Return to The Insider

The Insider Archives

Subscribe to receive this news via email every week

|
|

MEDIA CENTER

Interactive Media
Resources
Classifieds
Calendar
Consumer Resources
Media Kit
Advertiser Index
EAB
Reprints
Submit an Article

ADDITIONAL ONLINE RESOURCES

Allied Healthcare
Medical Education
24X7mag
Clinical Lab Products (CLP)
Orthodontic Products
The Hearing Industry Resource
Rehab Management
Physical Therapy Products
Plastic Surgery Practice
Imaging Economics
RT Magazine
Sleep Review
medCME
Practice Growth
Practice Builders
powered by:
Copyright © 2009 Ascend Media LLC | The Hearing Industry Resource | All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service