News Stories


Newsletter Subscribe Newsletter Home
Research

BHI Study Suggests Thin-Tube BTEs Appeal to Younger Audience

Alexandria, Va—A recent survey conducted by Sergei Kochkin, PhD, executive director of the Better Hearing Institute (BHI), looked at the reasons for purchasing “thin-tube” BTEs and sought to determine if this relatively new product class is causing more people to seek a hearing solution via hearing aids.

The study analyzed the use of “thin-tube” BTEs—including open-fit, receiver in the ear (RITE), on-the-ear (OTE), and post auricular canal (PAC) devices —in 116 dispensing offices that were members of the BHI Referral Development Network (see www.hearingreview.com/article.php?s=HR/2002/02&p=2). Each office/practice was asked questions about their last 2 customers fit with thin-tube BTEs (ie, a sample of 232 customers).

Of these 232 customers in the survey, 68% were new users, and the average age was 60 years. When compared to MarkeTrak VII data (see www.hearingreview.com/article.php?s=HR/2005/07&p=1), this represents a 29% increase in new users and a more youthful customer base (by an average of 9 years).
Patient involvement in the decision to purchase a thin-tube device was deemed as “major” in 16% of the fittings, “minor” in 66% of the fittings, and “none” in 17% of the fittings, suggesting that the dispensing professional’s recommendation was the key factor in the purchase. The top-five reasons for choosing the aids were less occlusion, fit and comfort issues, better sound quality, greater patient benefit, and cosmetics.

A total of 1-in-5 (22%) consumers would have otherwise rejected all other hearing aid technology in the absense of the thin-tube device, according to the dispensing professionals surveyed. Compared to traditional products, the hearing care professionals reported that 55% of their patients were “significantly more satisfied” with the thin-tube devices, while 36% were “more satisfied,” 8% experienced “equal” satisfaction, and 1% were “less satisfied.” 

Results from the survey suggest that the appeal of thin-tube BTEs are due to (in order of definite benefit):

  1. Less occlusion;
  2. Fit and comfort;
  3. Better sound quality;
  4. Better benefit;
  5. Visibility
  6. Directional mics;
  7. Hearing healthcare provider recommendation;
  8. Looks less like a hearing aid;
  9. Instant fit;
  10. Less returns;
  11. Responded to ads;
  12. No ear impression
  13. Customer recommendation;
  14. More power;
  15. Colors;
  16. More controls.

Cosmetics obviously play a large role in the appeal of the devices. If the patients who had not opted for thin-tube devices, the dispensing professionals said they would otherwise have chosen an ITC or CIC in 46% of cases, followed by mini-BTE (14%), BTE (12%), or ITE (7%) devices. New users were more likely to be motivated to choose the device based on visibility/cosmetics (45% cited this as a definite purchase reason vs 25% for experienced users), and 32% of new users (versus 17% for experienced users) were definitely motivated to choose the thin-tube device because it looks “less like a hearing aid.” When considering the new users, survey respondents said that 24% would have rejected a traditional hearing aid (versus 17% for experienced users).
 
A more in-depth look at the survey results will be offered by Kochkin in a future publication. For more information on BHI, visit www.betterhearing.org.

Bookmark and Share

Return to The Insider

The Insider Archives

Subscribe to receive this news via email every week

|
|

MEDIA CENTER

Interactive Media
Resources
Classifieds
Calendar
Consumer Resources
Media Kit
Advertiser Index
EAB
Reprints
Submit an Article
Copyright © 2010 Allied Media, a division of Anthem Media Group | The Hearing Review | Hearing Review Products | All Rights Reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service