News Stories
Research
BHI Study Suggests Thin-Tube BTEs Appeal to Younger Audience
Alexandria, Va—A recent survey conducted by Sergei Kochkin, PhD, executive director of the Better Hearing Institute (BHI), looked at the reasons for purchasing “thin-tube” BTEs and sought to determine if this relatively new product class is causing more people to seek a hearing solution via hearing aids.
The study analyzed the use of “thin-tube” BTEs—including open-fit, receiver in the ear (RITE), on-the-ear (OTE), and post auricular canal (PAC) devices —in 116 dispensing offices that were members of the BHI Referral Development Network (see www.hearingreview.com/article.php?s=HR/2002/02&p=2). Each office/practice was asked questions about their last 2 customers fit with thin-tube BTEs (ie, a sample of 232 customers).
Of these 232 customers in the survey, 68% were new users, and the average age was 60 years. When compared to MarkeTrak VII data (see www.hearingreview.com/article.php?s=HR/2005/07&p=1), this represents a 29% increase in new users and a more youthful customer base (by an average of 9 years). Patient involvement in the decision to purchase a thin-tube device was deemed as “major” in 16% of the fittings, “minor” in 66% of the fittings, and “none” in 17% of the fittings, suggesting that the dispensing professional’s recommendation was the key factor in the purchase. The top-five reasons for choosing the aids were less occlusion, fit and comfort issues, better sound quality, greater patient benefit, and cosmetics.
A total of 1-in-5 (22%) consumers would have otherwise rejected all other hearing aid technology in the absense of the thin-tube device, according to the dispensing professionals surveyed. Compared to traditional products, the hearing care professionals reported that 55% of their patients were “significantly more satisfied” with the thin-tube devices, while 36% were “more satisfied,” 8% experienced “equal” satisfaction, and 1% were “less satisfied.”
Results from the survey suggest that the appeal of thin-tube BTEs are due to (in order of definite benefit):
- Less occlusion;
- Fit and comfort;
- Better sound quality;
- Better benefit;
- Visibility
- Directional mics;
- Hearing healthcare provider recommendation;
- Looks less like a hearing aid;
- Instant fit;
- Less returns;
- Responded to ads;
- No ear impression
- Customer recommendation;
- More power;
- Colors;
- More controls.
Cosmetics obviously play a large role in the appeal of the devices. If the patients who had not opted for thin-tube devices, the dispensing professionals said they would otherwise have chosen an ITC or CIC in 46% of cases, followed by mini-BTE (14%), BTE (12%), or ITE (7%) devices. New users were more likely to be motivated to choose the device based on visibility/cosmetics (45% cited this as a definite purchase reason vs 25% for experienced users), and 32% of new users (versus 17% for experienced users) were definitely motivated to choose the thin-tube device because it looks “less like a hearing aid.” When considering the new users, survey respondents said that 24% would have rejected a traditional hearing aid (versus 17% for experienced users). A more in-depth look at the survey results will be offered by Kochkin in a future publication. For more information on BHI, visit www.betterhearing.org.
Return to The Insider
The Insider Archives
Subscribe to receive this news via email every week |
|
|
|
LOOKING FOR EXPERT ADVICE?
|
 |
|
|
|